Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Issenhuth

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 2014No. 26669PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Justice.

[f 1.] Dennis and Debra Peterson (Pe-tersons) sued their attorney, Thomas Is-senhuth and Issenhuth and Leibel, LLP (Issenhuth), for legal malpractice claiming that Issenhuth failed to properly represent Petersons’ interests in a breach of contract action brought against Petersons by H & S Builders, Inc. (H & S). The circuit court denied Petersons relief in the legal malpractice action for failing to prove proximate cause or damages. Petersons appeal. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

[¶ 2.] On May 22, 1990, Petersons purchased a 22.34-acre tract of land at Johnson’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Haberer v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Staab v. CameronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Weiss v. Van NormanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Eagle Ridge Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. SommersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Zhi Gang Zhang v. RasmusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Strong v. Atlas Hydraulics, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Slota v. ImhoffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Zhang v. RasmusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API