Legal Opinion
Zhang v. Rasmus
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 2019No. 28524PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
#28524-rev in pt & aff in pt-MES
2019 S.D. 46
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** ZHI GANG ZHANG, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DAN RASMUS, AN INDIVIDUAL, RASMUS LAW OFFICE, LLC; TIM JAMES, AN INDIVIDUAL, JAMES LAW, PC; WILLIAM R. SKOLNICK, AN INDIVIDUAL, AMY D. JOYCE, AN INDIVIDUAL, SKOLNICK & SHIFF, P.A., Defendants and Appellees. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT BROWN COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA **** THE HONORABLE SCOTT P. MYREN Judge **** DR. ZHI GANG ZHANG Aberdeen, South Dakota Pro Se plaintiff and appellant. ROBERT D. TRZYNKA of Cutler Law Firm,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Hughes v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robinson-Podoll v. Harmelink, Fox, & Ravnsborg Law OfficeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Slota v. ImhoffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Davis v. Otten and Meemic InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Fodness v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Barr v. ColeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.