Legal Opinion
United States v. Pearson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 21, 1933No. 798PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
Pearson brought this action against the United States to recover on a policy of war risk insurance. Trial by jury was waived and the action tried to the court. At the close of all the evidence, counsel for the government moved for judgment in its favor on the ground that the evidence failed to establish that Pearson became permanently andi totally disabled before the policy of insurance lapsed. The motion was overruled and judgment was entered for Pearson.
The burden was upon Pearson to establish by substantial evidence that he became) totally and permanently disabled…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nicolay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. RentfrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Roberts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Julian v. FolsomDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- United States v. DerrickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. RyeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. MathisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.