Legal Opinion
Schulman Investment Co. v. Olin Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 26, 1979No. 78 Civ. 176 (CHT)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
This diversity action arises out of the construction of two office buildings owned by the plaintiff, Schulman Investment Company (“Schulman”). Schulman alleges that the glass curtain walls installed in the buildings by defendant Olin Corporation (“Olin”) did not conform to the contract between the parties and were negligently designed and installed. Schulman charges Olin with breach of contract, breach of warranty, and negligence. In the motion before the Court, Olin moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rules”).…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Perlmutter v. Beth David HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Neuman v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Greater New York (In Re Neuman)District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1994
- Alderney Dairy Company, Inc. v. Hawthorn Mellody, Inc., and National Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Gluck v. Seaboard Surety Co. (In Re Eastern Freight Ways, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.