Legal Opinion
Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided January 21, 1994No. 4:92cv52PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
PAUL N. BROWN, District Judge.
On November 9, 1993, the parties appeared before the Court without a jury for a trial of the licensing and patent exhaustion issues in this case, and the Court having heard all the testimony and considered all admissible evidence, as well as the argument of counsel and their proposed findings and conclusions, hereby enters its findings of fact and conclusions of law as to the licensing and patent exhaustion issues in this case in conformity with Fed.R.Civ.P. 52. Any finding of fact which constitutes a conclusion of law shall…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. Masonite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Glass Equipment Development, Incorporated v. Besten, Inc., Defendant-Cross and Simonton Windows CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Minebea Co., Ltd. v. PapstDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Mass Engineered Design, Inc. v. Ergotron, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2009
- Minebea Co., Ltd. v. PapstDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Newbridge Networks Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.