Legal Opinion

Wildman v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1945No. Appeal, 157PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, P. J.,

We have before us this question: Did the claimant establish by sufficient proof that he lost the permanent use of his left eye on May 8, 1941, as the result of an accident while in the course of his employment

On July 2, 1941, the parties entered into a compensation agreement. It gave the following description of the accident: “Claimant was loading truck with brush, particle of dust from brush flew into eye. Inflamed and irritated left eye.” In September of that year the defendant, in payment of total disability from May 21, 1941, to July 3, 1941, tendered claimant a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Monahan v. Seeds & DurhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Icenhour v. Freedom Oil Works Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Diaz v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Curran v. Walter E. Knipe & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Diaz v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Wilson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Stachowski v. Incorporated Real Estate InvestorsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Criner v. McKee Glass Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API