Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1939No. Sac. 5230PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiffs, husband and wife, as a result of a collision between their automobile and a train of the defendant railroad company at a highway crossing. The conductor of the train, Rablin, was joined as a defendant. Other members of the train crew were named in the complaint as First Doe, Second Doe and Third Doe, but were never served with summons. The complaint charged that the said defendants, and each of them, “so negligently operated, conducted and ran a certain train owned by the defendant, Southern Pacific Company,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Bush v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Sheets v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
  5. DeElena v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API