Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Royal Wine & Liquor, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 22, 1946No. 8881PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAJOR, Circuit Judge.
The Administrator of the Office of Price Administration sought an injunction enjoining defendant from violating Maximum Price Regulation 445 (8 F.R. 11161). A temporary restraining order was entered upon the Administrator’s complaint and attached affidavits. After a hearing, the lower court entered an order awarding a preliminary injunction, and from this order defendant has appealed.
Defendant, an Illinois corporation, is engaged in the wholesale liquor business at Chicago, Illinois. Defendant employs seventeen salesmen to contact its customers and has been in business…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- United States v. HarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bowles v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Bowles v. May Hardwood Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. EricsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1951
- Coffin-Redington Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946