Legal Opinion

Coffin-Redington Co. v. Porter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1946No. 11147PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a decree enjoining appellant from selling whisky, directly or indirectly, (1) to purchasers whose orders are accepted only on condition that they also buy other beverages or commodities, (2) at prices in excess of those set by Maximum Price Regulation 445.

The first objection urged is to the finding of the trial court that distilled spirits were sold at prices higher than the maximum permitted by the regulation, whereas the parties had stipulated that “each item, itself, was within the ceiling.” However, the court found that there were tying agreements…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. v. A. Quandt & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  2. Bowles v. Royal Wine & Liquor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anchor Liquor Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  2. Pueblo v. Arce CortésSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
  3. Woods v. SchwartzDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Boyd v. BentonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API