Legal Opinion
Bowles v. May Hardwood Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 25, 1944No. 9548PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
Brown, former Administrator of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq. (now succeeded), sued, pursuant to § 205(a), to restrain the appellees from further violation of § 4(a), asserting that in his judgment they had violated Maximum Price Regulation No. 146 as amended. Upon the filing of an amended complaint by the Administrator, reciting the revocation of certain maximum ceiling prices in Regulation 146, the appellees moved to dismiss the bill, as amended, because the question raised therein had become moot and of no legal effect. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. HarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ring v. SpinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Koch v. Federal Trade CommmissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Rodgers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- Bowles v. Swift & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
- Bowles v. LeitholdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.