Legal Opinion

Standard Pipe Line Co. v. Index-Sulphur Drainage District

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 28, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). It is first contended by counsel for the defendant that its pipe line is not real estate and could not be classified as^ such by the Legislature in the acts creating said improvement districts. There is a conflict in the adjudicated cases as to whether or not the right-of-way of a railroad company or of a telegraph company is subject to local assessments, but this court has held that the right-of-way of a railroad corporation or of a telegraph company is subject to local assessment as real property. Missouri Pac. Rd. Co. v. Comway County Bridge Dist.,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. DecaturSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Valley Farms Co. of Yonkers v. County of WestchesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Board of Directors of Red River Levee Dist. No. 1 of Lafayette County v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  2. Sinclair Refining Co. v. BurroughsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  3. International Paper Co. v. MCI Worldcom Network Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2002
  4. Price v. Drainage District No. 17Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Lessenberry v. Little Rock-Pulaski Drainage District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API