Price v. Drainage District No. 17
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
Various landowners filed three (3) separate suits alleging that a tax by appellee drainage district constituted an illegal exaction because, among other reasons, there was a failure to levy the tax. One of the suits was certified as a class action with the class representing all of the taxpayers in the district. The three (3) cases were then consolidated. The appellee district filed a motion for summary judgment. At a hearing on the motion some of the district’s records were stipulated into evidence. The trial court granted summary judgment and dismissed the case. We…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Brunson v. Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Certain Lots Upon Which Taxes Are Delinquent v. Town of MonticelloSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- Vance v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875
- Commonwealth v. Chesapeake, Ohio & Southwestern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oldner v. VillinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1995
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2008
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.