Legal Opinion

Price v. Drainage District No. 17

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 16, 1990No. 89-249PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Various landowners filed three (3) separate suits alleging that a tax by appellee drainage district constituted an illegal exaction because, among other reasons, there was a failure to levy the tax. One of the suits was certified as a class action with the class representing all of the taxpayers in the district. The three (3) cases were then consolidated. The appellee district filed a motion for summary judgment. At a hearing on the motion some of the district’s records were stipulated into evidence. The trial court granted summary judgment and dismissed the case. We…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Brunson v. Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  3. Certain Lots Upon Which Taxes Are Delinquent v. Town of MonticelloSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  4. Vance v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875
  5. Commonwealth v. Chesapeake, Ohio & Southwestern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Oldner v. VillinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1995
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2008
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API