Legal Opinion

Doheny West Homeowners' Ass'n v. Am. Guarantee & Liab. Ins. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1997No. B103415PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

In this case, we consider the scope of collapse coverage in a property insurance policy, an issue which has long been the subject of litigation in other states. The insurance policy before us covered “loss or damage caused by or resulting from risks of direct physical loss involving collapse of a building or any part of a building” resulting from specified causes. We reject the position of a number of states, that such a clause covers only “actual collapse,” and agree with those states, and the trial court here, which find that such a clause covers actual or imminent…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Government Employees Insurance v. DeJamesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Beach v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. 401 Fourth Street, Inc. v. Investors Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Rosen v. State Farm General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Jack Buczek v. Continental Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  4. Assurance Company of America, a Maryland Corporation v. Wall & Associates LLC of Olympia, a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Jordan v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API