Legal Opinion
Hayden v. Friedman
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 22, 1961No. Civ. 19254PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, J.
Plaintiff brought this action in Los Angeles County on January 28, 1957, for a partnership accounting. Subsequently the case was removed to Santa Clara County pursuant to an order granting a motion for change of venue. After the matter was at issue and on October 24, 1957, a memorandum to set the cause for trial was filed by the plaintiff with the clerk. The pertinent portion of the memorandum on this appeal reads as follows: ‘ ‘ The Court is requested to set the above entitled cause for trial. Nature of Action (state fully) breach of contracts, accounting and constructive fraud. Is Jury…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dowell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Parker v. James Granger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Connell v. BowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Glogau v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Peterson v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Byram v. Superior Ct. of Sacramento Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Gonzales v. NorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- De Castro v. RoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Hackin v. Pioneer Plumbing Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Turlock Golf & County Club v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.