Ramonett v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Chief Judge.
The issue in this case is whether the petitioner employee’s anxiety neurosis is a compensable result of his industrially related injury.
Petitioner, David M. Ramonett, had been employed three months as an electrician’s helper underground when he accidentally pricked his finger on some wires, fainted, and went into convulsions. He recovered with seemingly nothing more major than a slightly cut finger and a minor head laceration which he sustained when he fell, but because of the fainting and convulsions he embarked on a series of medical tests. It was feared he might…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Tatman v. Provincial HomesArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Brock v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Valerio v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Treadway v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dutton v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Dugan v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Allstate Insurance v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. GirardotWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Barnes v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.