Legal Opinion

Dugan v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 5, 1995No. 1 CA-CV 93-0464PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EHRLICH, Judge.

Sarah Dugan’s husband, Joseph Dugan, and the Dugans’ four adult children (collectively, “plaintiffs”) appeal from the summary judgment in favor of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (“TRS”) and the subsequent denial of their motions for new trial. Because we conclude that Mrs. Dugan had a compensable brain injury due to an industrially-related, intervening injury combining with her non-industrial, pre-existing heart condition, we affirm the trial court’s judgment that the plaintiffs are precluded from maintaining an action in tort against TRS.

FACTS 1…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. AROK Construction Co. v. Indian Construction ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. Young v. Environmental Air Products, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Swichtenberg v. BrimerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Diaz v. Magma Copper Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Smithey v. HansbergerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. Inmon v. Crane Rental Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. Rosarita Mexican Foods v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. City of Tucson and Pinnacle Risk Management v. Scott WoodworthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API