Barnes v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Judge.
This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission award for a noncompensable claim. Two issues are presented:(1) Whether the administrative law judge applied the correct legal standard to the psychiatric evidence.(2) Whether the award is reasonably supported by the evidence.
Since we answer both of these inquiries in the affirmative, we affirm.
The petitioner employee (claimant) allegedly suffered two separate industrial injuries on January 14, 1985, and June 3, 1985, while employed by the respondent employer, Arizona Department of Economic Security (ADES).
On…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Malinski v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Tatman v. Provincial HomesArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Sloss v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Holding v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Murphy v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- France v. gila/arizona CountiesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- John R France v. ica/gila county/acipArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- John R France v. ica/gila county/acipArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- Lawless v. northern/securisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.