Legal Opinion

MacHado v. Flores

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 12, 1946No. Civ. 15233PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

On July 28, 1919, a judgment for damages in a personal injury action was rendered against Albert F. Machado, hereinafter called appellant, in the amount o£ $10,000, in favor of Concepcion Avila whose administratrix is the respondent Albertina Flores. For the purpose of renewing such judgment, Concepcion Avila filed a complaint on August 29, 1924. Three years later the summons therein was returned to the clerk showing personal service on appellant as of August 29, 1927, and on January 3, 1928, a default judgment was entered against the appellant. The salient feature of this appeal arises from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bell v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Tyrrell v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Demens v. HueneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Todhunter v. KlemmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Lee v. ColquhounCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davis v. SchiessWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Collison v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Sacks v. FSR Brokerage, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Grappo v. McMillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Kern v. KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API