Legal Opinion

Davis v. Schiess

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1966No. 3464PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE

Action was brought for damages based on fraud and deceit in connection with the purchase of a motel, with a service station and cafe, at Afton, Wyoming.

The purchasers of the motel and plaintiffs in the action were C. H. Davis and Shirley Lou Davis. The vendors and defendants were Lon Schiess and Nettie Schiess. They made a counterclaim in the action, for reformation of the contract between the parties, seeking to change the purchase price to $85,000 instead of $75,000 as stated in the purchase agreement.

At first plaintiffs succeeded on trial to a jury and obtained a verdict for $21,000…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank v. SwanWyoming Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Twing v. SchottWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Horner v. WagyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Holland v. LentzOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Apolito v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SoulisWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hagar v. MobleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Reynolds v. TiceWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Cody v. AtkinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hollabaugh v. KolbetWyoming Supreme Court · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API