Legal Opinion
Frederickson v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 25, 1996No. 1 CA-SA 96-0123PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
Randal Frederickson, the Petitioner, filed a petition for special action from the trial judge’s denial of his request for a jury trial. Following argument, we accepted jurisdiction and granted relief because we concluded that leaving the scene of an accident is a crime of moral turpitude and that the Petitioner is therefore entitled to a jury trial. This opinion explains our decision.
The Petitioner was charged with leaving the scene of an accident in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 28-662. He filed a request for a jury trial in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Dean v. DolnyArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- State v. HortonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- People v. BautistaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Derendal v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Benitez v. DunevantArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Amancio v. ForsterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Cambas v. Department of Business & Professional RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.