Legal Opinion

People v. Bautista

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1990No. A044113PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENSON, J.

Roberto Bautista appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of first degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459). The court denied appellant’s in limine motion to exclude his prior conviction of felony hit-and-run (Veh. Code, § 20001). The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in admitting appellant’s prior felony conviction for impeachment purposes. Appellant argues that the court erred in admitting the prior conviction because that offense does not necessarily involve moral turpitude. The issue is one of first impression. We conclude that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. People v. StatlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cerezo v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. People v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Benitez v. DunevantArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. DeweyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API