Legal Opinion
State v. Harrison
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 1, 1990No. 1 CA-CR 89-007PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERBER, Judge.
Appellant Mark Preston Harrison (defendant) was charged with running a red light in violation of A.R.S. § 28-645(A)(3)(a), failing to provide proof of insurance in violation of A.R.S. § 28-1253(D), and driving a motor vehicle in violation of a license restriction under A.R.S. § 28-424 requiring him to wear eye glasses. The violations were consolidated and tried before the Phoenix City Court. 1 Defendant was found in violation on all three counts. He was fined $408 and had his license suspended 90 days for running the red light and failing to provide proof of insurance,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- O'NEILL v. MangumArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Bruce v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Philip Landry v. Judge J. Robert Hoepfner and William Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Derendal v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State Ex Rel. McDougall v. StrohsonArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Benitez v. DunevantArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Mungarro v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Campbell v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.