Legal Opinion
Murata Manufacturing Co. v. Bel Fuse, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 15, 2006No. 03 C 2934PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I
BACKGROUND
This is a patent infringement ease. The patent-in-suit, Murata’s '641 patent, is directed to a modular jack of the kind used in computers and similar electronic devices. The jack has an integrated noise suppression feature designed to reduce the adverse effects of an extraneous electromagnetic field or signal. Murata alleges that Bel Fuse: (1) is making, using, selling, importing and/or offering for sale infringing modular jacks in the United States in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a); and (2) has induced and continues…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Heraeus Kulzer, GmbH v. Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Patrick v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- United States v. BulgerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. Technology Research Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- United Automobile Insurance Company v. VeluchamyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.