Legal Opinion

Application of Prutton

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 29, 1953No. Patent Appeals 5952PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 1 to 3, 5 to 14 and 21 to 24 of appellant’s application, serial No. 2,321, for a patent on a “Lubricating Composition.” No claims were allowed.

In his brief appellant withdrew the appeal as to claims 3, 6, 7, 9, 13 and 24, which are directed to a non-elected species. Such withdrawal is treated as a motion to dismiss these claims and the motion is allowed. In re Horneman, 194 F.2d 108, 39 C.C.P.A., Patents, 809. This leaves…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Overland Motor Co. v. Packard Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Hemphill Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  3. Blackford v. WilderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. In Re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  5. In re Barratt's AppealCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Application of Milton E. HerrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  2. Application of Dwin R. Craig and John N. StreetCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  3. Application of Hans T. F. Lundberg and Theodore Zuschlag, Deceased, by Johanna Zuschlag, AdministratrixCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  4. Application of Benjamin Gruskin, Deceased, by Irma Kelly GruskinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  5. Old Charter Distillery Co. v. Continental Distilling Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API