Legal Opinion
Sauls v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided March 7, 2012No. C.A. No. 9:04-22297-HMHPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
HENRY M. HERLONG, JR., Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a). Plaintiff Lydia Sauls (“Sauls”) alleges that three prescription hormone replacement therapy medications manufactured by Defendants-Premarin, Prempro, and Provera (collectively hereinafter referred to as “hormone therapy medications”)-caused her to develop breast cancer. She claims that the hormone therapy medications she ingested were defective because Defendants failed to adequately warn of the risks of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Wankier v. Crown Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Young Ex Rel. Estate of Young v. Tide Craft, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Monahan v. County of ChesterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown-Thomas v. HynieDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
- Parkinson v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Fields v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2015
- Vieira v. Harris (In re JK Harris & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
- Adams v. U.S. Dep't of LaborDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.