Fields v. Eli Lilly & Co.
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief Judge.
In this pharmaceutical products liability action, Plaintiff Dana Fields alleges that her use of Prozac® during her pregnancy in the mid-1990s caused her son, D.F., to be bom with a congenital heart defect. She brings this action both individually and as the natural parent of D.F., seeking monetary recovery on various state-law claims from the drug’s manufacturer, Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”). Before the court is Lilly’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. # 90.) Lilly argues that Mrs. Fields cannot establish a genuine dispute of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial P.R. Wireless Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Joseph MacUba v. Matthew Deboer, Michael Youseff, Charlotte Commissioners, Individually and in Their Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mark Blackburn v. Shire US IncCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Blackburn v. Shire US IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
- Himes v. Somatics, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2024
- Ruckman v. PHH Mortgage CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Smith v. AngioDynamics, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2024