Legal Opinion
Spatz v. Borenstein
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 1, 1981No. 76 C 4477PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs David Spatz (“Spatz”) and Charles A. Janda (“Janda”) have moved for summary judgment on Counts III through VI in this action alleging violations of § 12(2) and § 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933,15 U.S.C. §§ 77a-77aa (the “Securities Act”), § 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78a-78hh (the “Exchange Act”), Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, and § 12 of the Illinois Securities Law of 1953, Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 121V2, § 137.1 et seq., by defendants Joseph Borenstein…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Beck v. Cantor, Fitzgerald & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Frymire v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CoatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Soderberg v. GensDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,155 Richard Atchley v. Qonaar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.