Legal Opinion

Carolina Power & Light Company v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1965No. 771PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants’ first assignment of error, and the one principally relied on in the oral argument, is the denial of their motion to set the verdict aside. The motion is based on the fact that C. L. Pemberton, who, as trustee in the deed of trust described in section 6 of the petition, and for that reason a defendant herein, took an active part as counsel for petitioner in the trial of the case. This dual relationship of defendant and counsel for petitioner, they contend, is so contrary to public policy as to make the trial void. They do not charge any improper or wrongful conduct on the part of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hare v. . WeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Lorbacher v. TalleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Wolfe v. North Carolina Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Pearson v. . CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Redevelopment Commission of High Point v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API