Lorbacher v. Talley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
At trial, plaintiff testified in support of his allegations. Defendant, on cross-examination of plaintiff and by evidence in direct contradition of plaintiff’s testimony, sought to impeach plaintiff and thereby discredit plaintiff’s testimony. Indeed, the testimony of one witness for defendant was to the effect plaintiff attempted by bribe to induce him to testify in plaintiff’s favor.
In rebuttal, plaintiff offered witnesses who, if permitted, would have testified that plaintiff’s general reputation in the community was good. Two such witnesses were called to so testify. The court sustained…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Bowman v. . BlankenshipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Norris v. Stewart's HeirsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Kirkpatrick v. . CrutchfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Nance v. FikeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. StegmannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.