State v. Jordan
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMoRRis, J.
Defendant’s court-appointed counsel requested and received an extension of time within which to docket his case on appeal but failed to docket the case within the extension period. This Court has nevertheless decided to review the case on its merits.
Defendant’s first assignment of error is directed to the failure of the trial court to allow his motion to quash the bills of indictment. This assignment of error was not brought forward and argued in defendant’s brief and it is, therefore, .deemed abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
By assignments of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mancusi v. DeForteSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. GrahamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972