Legal Opinion

Redevelopment Commission of High Point v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

The issue as to the amount of damages or compensation .was for determination de novo by jury trial in the superior court. G.S. 40-19; G.S. 40-20; Proctor v. Highway Commission, 230 N.C. 687, 55 S.E. 2d 479; Gallimore v. Highway Comm., 241 N.C. 350, 85 S.E. 2d 392.

Henry Shavitz, called by respondents, testified, after qualification, as an expert witness in the field of real estate appraisal. On direct examination, he testified in his opinion the fair market value of the subject property as of November 8, 1965, was $11,000.00. No reference was made to the fact he had served as one of the three…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Proctor v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Rudd Ex Rel. Rudd v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Carolina Power & Light Company v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cole v. SorieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Redevelopment Commission of High Point v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API