Legal Opinion

Furtado v. Gemmell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1965PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWAB, J. (Pro Tempore).

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a decree of the circuit court which dismissed their suit for the rescission of a contract of sale whereby they undertook the purchase from the defendants of a machine shop business in Echo, Oregon. The complaint sought the desired relief upon charges of false representations.

On June 28, 1961, Mr. Gemmell listed the machine shop property for sale at a price of $14,800 with Ted Vaughn, a salesman for the Strout Realty organization. The listing agreement recited that the gross receipts for the twelve-month period preceding the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Hefferan v. FreebairnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Hansen v. HolmbergOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Caples v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Bodenhamer v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Krause v. Eugene Dodge, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Lanners v. WhitneyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Gardner v. MeilingOregon Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API