Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Moore v. . Bell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1926PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1ConcurrenceClarkson, J.

Action by plaintiffs, citizens and residents of the State of North Carolina, to restrain and enjoin defendants, members of the Game Commission of Currituck County, from enforcing the provisions of certain statutes enacted by the General Assembly of North Carolina, creating a Game Commission for Currituck County, and conferring upon said commission certain powers relative to the protection of game in said county, upon the ground that said statutes are in violation of the Constitution of North Carolina, and therefore void. From order restraining and enjoining defendants from acting as members…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daniels v. HomerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Wardens St. Peter's Episcopal Church v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Paul v. WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. Thompson v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. . LuedersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Newman v. . Comrs. of VanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Angelo v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. City of Elizabeth City v. AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Newman v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API