Legal Opinion

City of Elizabeth City v. Aydlett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 9, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STACY, C. J., and ADAMS, J., concurring. This is a proceeding for injunctive relief. The plaintiff is a municipal corporation, and duly passed an ordinance regulating the location and erection of filling or gasoline stations within certain territory within the corporate limits of Elizabeth City before defendant was indicted for its violation.

The complaint, among other things, alleges: "That the defendant, A. L. Aydlett, his servants, agents and employees are wrongfully, unlawfully and in violation of said ordinance, locating, erecting, building and constructing a filling station upon that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Paul v. WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Thompson v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Scott v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. Vickers v. Durham.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Elizabeth v. AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. City of Fayetteville v. Spur Distributing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Mears v. Colonial BeachSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  4. North Carolina Board of Pharmacy v. LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. City of Elizabeth v. AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API