Legal Opinion

State v. Bloom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1994No. C9-94-55PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

Agreeing with the state on the central issue in each of three separate criminal appeals decided today,1 we hold, first, that the National Research Council’s recent adoption of the conservative “interim ceiling method” for computation of the probability that a randomly selected person would have the same DNA profile as that of a sample of bodily fluids found at a crime scene justifies the creation of a DNA exception to the rule against the admission of statistical probability evidence in criminal prosecutions to prove identity; second, that if the evidentiary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. United States v. Adrian Paul MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. State v. JobeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LaniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. People v. HerndonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. People v. VenegasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Fugate v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API