Legal Opinion

People v. Venegas

California Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1998No. S044870PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

I. Introduction

Defendant was convicted of rape by a jury that heard incriminating evidence based on forensic analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). The prosecution’s evidence indicated (1) that defendant’s DNA profile matched the DNA profile of semen recovered from the victim’s body and from bedding at the crime scene, and (2) that the probability of a match between those DNA profiles and the profile of a person chosen at random from the general population was 1 in 65,000.

The Court of Appeal reversed the conviction for prejudicial error in the admission of the DNA evidence,…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. People v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. SmitheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. PrinceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. RielCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. GeierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API