Legal Opinion
Sugrue v. Derwinski
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 18, 1992No. CV-90-1972; CV-91-2041PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
In two pending actions, plaintiff Daniel Sugrue alleges that the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) and its employees violated his constitutional and statutory rights in determining his veterans’ benefits award. Plaintiff moves to serve a second amended complaint in the first action, CV-90-1972 (“Sugrue I”), which is identical to a complaint already filed in the second action, CV-91-2041 (“Sugrue II”). The government moves to dismiss both Sugrue I and Sugrue II for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sugrue v. DerwinskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Menendez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
- Respass v. New York City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Marozsan v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
- United State v. EadarsoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.