Legal Opinion

Menendez v. United States

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided September 3, 1999No. 98-2005(SEC)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CASELLAS, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and/or for failure to state a claim filed by defendant United States of America (Docket # 6). Said motion was duly opposed by plaintiff (Docket # 9). For the reasons stated below in this Opinion and Order, defendant’s motion to dismiss (Docket # 6) is GRANTED and the above-captioned action shall be DISMISSED. ^

Factual Background

We take the facts relevant to our determination from plaintiffs allegations in his Amended Complaint (Docket # 3). Plaintiff Mibeck Menéndez enlisted in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Aversa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Traynor v. TurnageSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Beamon v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. Moreno v. John Crane, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fernandez Molinary v. Industrias La Famosa, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
  2. Twum-Baah v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.United States District Court · 2018
  3. Cortes Castillo v. Veterans AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2006
  4. Thomas v. PrincipiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  5. Murrhee v. PrincipiDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API