National Labor Relations Board v. P. B. And S. Chemical Company
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order of May 24, 1976, 1 adjudging P. B. and S. Chemical Company to be in violation of the Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 151,158(a)(1), 2 that is, in discrimi-natorily discharging employees Jack and Rick Brookover and Raymond Starkey, for exercising protected concerted activities; impermissibly questioning employees about signing union authorization cards; and suspending annual wage reviews and increases until resolution of the pending unionization of employees. The Board directed reinstatement of the three with back pay. The employer confesses…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Corrie Corporation of Charleston v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- The Torrington Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Materials Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jamestown Veneer & Plywood Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Grand Canyon Mining Company, Grand Canyon Mining Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Overnite Transportation Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Standard-Coosa-Thatcher Carpet Yarn Division, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- NLRB v. Grand Canyon MiningCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Maryland Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.