Legal Opinion
Overnite Transportation Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 13, 2002No. 99-2494, 00-1065PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge.
In this case, we decide whether, under the principles of NLRB v. Gissel, 395 U.S. 575, 89 S.Ct. 1918, 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969), the National Labor Relations Board properly ordered a company to bargain with a union that did not win its representation election.
In the fall of 1994, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO, and its affiliated locals (“Teamsters”) began a nationwide campaign to organize the employees of Overnite Transportation Company, headquartered in Richmond, Virginia. At that time, Overnite was one of the nation’s largest non-union…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. Exchange Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Torres (In Re Torres)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- In re SanchezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Laudani v. Wells Fargo N.A. (In re Laudani)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Overnite Transportation Company v. National Labor Relations Board, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Overnite Transportation Company, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002