Legal Opinion

Fremont State Bank v. Old State Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1927No. Docket No. 5PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

This case originated in justice’s court. The return of the justice is quite elaborate. It contains a statement of testimony given, his conclusions on it, sets up the issue before him, the proceedings had thereon, and in the circuit it was stipulated that his return should stand as the agreed facts in the case. It will, therefore, be treated as a finding of facts. From this return it appears that one Misner was indebted to -defendant bank in the sum of $590.80. He had executed a chattel mortgage to secure this indebtedness, but this mortgage did not have annexed thereto the affidavit required…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Esper v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Harnau v. HaightMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. J. O. Nessen Lumber Co. v. Ray H. Bennett Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Baker v. ParkhurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Crusoe Bros. v. KudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rossman v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Warner v. LongwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Berger Furnace Co. v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API