Legal Opinion
PROBUILD EAST, LLC v. Poffenberger
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 12, 2012No. AC 32996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendant, Adrian C. Poffenb-erger, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, ProBuild East, LLC. The defendant claims that the court improperly determined that (1) the plaintiffs mechanic’s lien was valid in accordance with General Statutes § 49-34, (2) alienable fund existed where the general contractor was paid the contract price in full and (3) a lienable fund existed where the contract between the defendant and the general contractor did not comply with the Home Improvement Act (act), General Statutes § 20-418 et seq. We affirm the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Seaman v. Climate Control Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Meadows v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- H & S TORRINGTON ASSOCIATES v. Lutz Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- J. C. Penney Properties, Inc. v. Peter M. Santella Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Absolute Plumbing & Heating, LLC v. EdelmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Pittu v. Bugaj Contractors Co., LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025