Boykin v. Ott
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
The Oregon Financial Responsibility Law, ORS ch 486, requires uninsured drivers and owners of motor vehicles involved in certain accidents to prove “future financial responsibility,” normally meaning to purchase insurance. Acting under the authority of that Law, the Motor Vehicles Division suspended the drivers’ licenses and motor vehicle registrations of the 11 petitioners, all of whom were uninsured① drivers and/or owners of vehicles involved in separate, unrelated accidents, and none of whom filed proof of future responsibility. At a subsequent consolidated administrative hearing the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Schecter v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. NothausSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Orr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. StroupOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Anacker v. SillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Floyd v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Ames v. MOTOR VEHICLES DIV., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.