State v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
The state appeals from an order that dismissed a charge of misdemeanor driving while suspended (DWS). ORS 487.560 (1),(5). The trial court held that, under State v. Tooley, 297 Or 602, 687 P2d 1068 (1984), due process requires that there be an opportunity for a hearing before a license suspension, and, because defendant did not have such an opportunity, dismissed the charge. On appeal, the state argues that it was error to dismiss, because State v. Tooley, supra, is based on statutory grounds inapplicable here, and because MVD’s order of suspension otherwise complies with due process. We…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. AldrichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. BennerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. CowieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.