Legal Opinion
Orr v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided May 29, 1969No. S. F. 22651PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
The Department of Motor Vehicles and its director seek prohibition to restrain respondent superior court from taking any further action or proceedings in an action against them in which real parties in interest (the vehicle drivers or operators) pray for judgment declaring portions of the financial responsibility laws (§§16080 and 16100 of the Veh. Code 1 ) unconstitutional and void in and of themselves and as applied to such drivers, and for restoration of their driving privileges and licenses. 2 As will appear we have concluded that the writ should be denied and the lower court authorized…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Escobedo v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Endler v. SchutzbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Sokol v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Finley v. OrrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Rios v. CozensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Department of Motor Vehicles of Cal. v. RiosSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re Questions Submitted by the United States District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Anacker v. SillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Thornley v. Wyoming Highway Department, Motor Vehicle DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.