Stults v. Palmer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The defendants have appealed from a judgment awarding the plaintiff Sally A. Stults $9000 in damages for personal injuries and the plaintiff Marie B. Stults $900 for damage to her automobile. The defendants contend that the damages awarded each plaintiff were excessive. In making this claim, they maintain that the trial court erred in finding facts without evidence, “as such findings contradict the findings made by the Court as expressed in the Memorandum of Decision.” In support of their contention that the court erred in rendering judgment for the plaintiff Sally to recover $9000 in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goldblatt v. FerrignoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Squires v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Turner v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Sette v. DakisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Littlejohn v. ElionskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bridgeport Pipe Engineering Co. v. DeMatteo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Begley v. Kohl & Madden Printing Ink Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Banks v. AdelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Davis v. P. Gambardella & Son Cheese CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Horton v. VickersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.