Legal Opinion

Littlejohn v. Elionsky

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 3, 1944PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.

The only claim pursued upon this appeal is that the trial court erred in its instruction to the jury as to the damages recoverable by the plaintiff for injury to his automobile. The plaintiff offered evidence and claimed to have proved that at the time of the collision his car was reasonably worth $935 to $950, and was a total loss but was sold for $100. The defendant’s claim of proof was that the automobile was not totally destroyed, but could be and was repaired at a cost of $400. The charge complained of was: “If you find for the plaintiff you will assess such damages as you feel will…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Garford Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  2. Bullard v. De CordovaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hedderman v. Robert Hall of Waterbury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  2. Stults v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  3. Newman v. BROWNSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. Dorne v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  5. Papenheim v. LovellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API