Legal Opinion

Squires v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 5, 1939PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

No useful purpose would be served by discussing in detail the many corrections which are sought in the finding. No change can be made which will affect the issue of liability. The Waterbury-Middlebury road is a two lane, concrete, trunk line highway twenty feet wide. The plaintiff was crossing on foot, at night, from north to south intending to enter Yale Avenue. He saw the headlights of the car driven by the named defendant, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, approaching from the west and waited in the north lane to allow it to pass in front of him. The defendant, in avoiding two…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. BeatmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Richmond v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  3. Lombardi v. WalladSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Bates v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  5. Avery v. SpicerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Younger v. Marshall Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Collins v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  3. Gibo v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Stults v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. Hemmings v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API