State v. Ruff
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*100EDMONDS, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of controlled substances, ORS 475.894, and assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We review the trial court’s legal conclusions for errors of law, but we defer to the court’s findings of historical fact so long as there is sufficient evidence in the record to support them. State v. Ehly, 317 Or 66, 75, 854 P2d 421 (1993). For the reasons expressed below, we affirm.
The following facts are uncontested. Officer Linck, a member of the Newberg Dundee Police Department, went to a city park…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. McJunkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. KeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. KeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- State v. RuffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009