London Bridge Resort, Inc. v. Mohave County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Judge.
¶ 1 The question we must answer in this appeal is whether Mohave County exceeded its statutory authority in valuing time-share condominium units by considering estimated market values of time-share interval interests associated with the units. Because the County’s valuation method complies with Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 33-1204 (2000), we conclude that the County did not exceed its authority in adopting its sales comparison valuation method. We therefore affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 The appellants are London Bridge Resort, Inc. and Resort Association, Inc.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lake Havasu City v. Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Business Realty of Arizona, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Blum v. STATE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Johnson v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Airport Properties v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- SolarCity Corp. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Mesquite v. AdorArizona Supreme Court · 2024
- Neptune Swimming Foundation v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 2024