Legal Opinion

London Bridge Resort, Inc. v. Mohave County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 10, 2001No. 1 CA-TX 00-0013PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYAN, Judge.

¶ 1 The question we must answer in this appeal is whether Mohave County exceeded its statutory authority in valuing time-share condominium units by considering estimated market values of time-share interval interests associated with the units. Because the County’s valuation method complies with Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 33-1204 (2000), we conclude that the County did not exceed its authority in adopting its sales comparison valuation method. We therefore affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The appellants are London Bridge Resort, Inc. and Resort Association, Inc.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lake Havasu City v. Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Business Realty of Arizona, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Blum v. STATE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Johnson v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. Airport Properties v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. SolarCity Corp. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  3. Mesquite v. AdorArizona Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Neptune Swimming Foundation v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API